Skip to main content

Table 2 Means (SD) and 95% CIs for the age, body weight, and the radiographic parameters calculating lateral (Norberg and Centre edge angles) and dorsal (width and area indices) acetabular femoral head coverage, acetabular slope angle, and inclination angle for Labrador Retrievers and German Shepherds with normal and near-normal coxofemoral joints (CFJs)

From: Radiographic quantification of the normal and near-normal coxofemoral conformation in Labrador Retrievers and German Shepherds: a comparative study

Variable

Labrador Retriever

German Shepherd

Normal CFJ (n = 46)

Near-normal CFJ (n = 28)

Normal CFJ (n = 42)

Near-normal CFJ (n = 34)

95% CI

Mean (SD)

95% CI

Mean (SD)

95% CI

Mean (SD)

95% CI

Mean (SD)

Age (year)

8.6–10.8

9.7 (2.8)

7.6–9.6

8.6 (2.1)

3.8–6.1

5.0 (3.3)†

2.6–5.3

4.0 (3.6)•

Body weight (kg)

30.0–34.6

32.3 (5.8)

30.6–35.2

32.9 (5.4)

33.4–38.2

35.8 (6.6)†

31.8–37.2

34.5 (6.5)

Norberg angle (degree)

109.3–111.0

110.2 (2.8)

108.3–110.3

109.3 (2.6)

106.8–108.3

107.5 (2.3)†

102.8–103.6

103.2 (1.1)*•

Centre-edge angle (degree)

28.4–29.2

28.8 (1.2)

27.0–28.6

27.8 (2.1)*

26.1–27.1

26.6 (1.6)†

21.8–22.7

22.3 (1.3)*•

Dorsal acetabular coverage width index

0.54–0.57

0.56 (0.05)

0.51–0.56

0.54 (0.06)

0.51–0.55

0.53 (0.05)†

0.49–0.54

0.51 (0.07)

Dorsal acetabular coverage area index

0.58–0.61

0.60 (0.05)

0.53–0.57

0.55 (0.06)*

0.53–0.56

0.55 (0.05)†

0.50–0.55

0.53 (0.07)

Acetabular slope angle (degree)

6.7–9.1

7.9 (4.1)

6.9–9.3

8.1 (3.0)

11.5–14.6

13.1 (4.9)†

11.2–14.3

12.7 (4.5)•

Inclination angle (degree)

128.6–132.7

130.6 (6.8)

134.2–138.7

136.5 (5.8)*

128.7–132.1

130.4 (5.4)

128.2–132.1

130.2 (5.6)•

  1. *Within a variable, the mean is significantly (P < 0.05) different from the mean for the normal CFJs within the same breed group
  2. †Within a variable, the mean is significantly (P < 0.05) different from the mean for the normal CFJs of the other breed group
  3. •Within a variable, the mean is significantly (P < 0.05) different from the mean for the near-normal CFJs of the other breed group